Kingston back to square one in election process



Published on June 10th, 2010
Published on June 10th, 2010
Nancy Kelly RSS Feed

Democratic do-over

Topics :
Nova Scotia

BY NANCY KELLY 

Kings County Advertiser/Register

The democratic process came under scrutiny at the June 8 annual meeting of the Kingston village commission.

Thirty village residents gathered for the meeting, which veered off course just as Chairman Tom Beardsley called for a motion to acclaim Cory Lingard to the commission’s vacant seat. 

“I have some concerns on this matter,” interjected ratepayer Lloyd Sundby, “and I’d like to be more clear on this.”

Sundby was referring to the village’s last minute decision to hold an advance poll for the election of one commissioner.  May 26, incumbent commissioner Doug Beaman filed his nomination for the position, as did newcomer Lingard. In the week following the nomination deadline, Beardsley and village clerk Greg Towne, after consulting with the village’s municipal advisor, made the decision to allow a poll. Objecting to a lack of consultation and to the unadvertised “11th-hour” decision he felt favoured the other candidate, Beaman withdrew his candidacy and submitted his resignation from the commission June 2, just days before the end of his term. 

Defending a decision which might “generate more community involvement” in the voting procedure, Towne admitted the “onus to advertise (the advance poll) would have been on the candidates to get the word out.”  Voters were notified through posters placed at the village and post office.

Former commissioner John Pierce said he was “more concerned with the process.”  When he pressed Beardsley to reveal if other commissioners had been consulted about establishing an advance poll, Beardsley confirmed that was not the case.

“I will take responsibility for that,” said Beardsley.

Pierce’s position was shared by many at the meeting, including former commissioner Scott Peckford, who said “the haste of the decision has left people uncomfortable.”

Another village resident claimed the decision “doesn’t have a nice smell to it for our little village.”

Lingard, whose request generated the decision to hold the advance poll, was in attendance.

“I understand why people are upset, but that was not my purpose,” said Lingard, who indicated his interest in having an advance poll was about getting more people involved in village affairs. 

After a lengthy discussion of the issue, Sundby moved the village to call for new nominations and begin the process all over again.  The vote, recorded by a show of hands, was overwhelmingly in favour of the motion. 

Towne said he would consult with Service Nova Scotia and Municipal Affairs before announcing new dates for nominations and advanced and regular polling if required.

Comments

  • Username
    Darren Finn
    - June 14th, 2010 at 08:38:03

    I’ve been a candidate in six different elections to date, so I have some experinece in this area, but I’ve never read something so concerning about an election process as what I’ve read in two recent articles (Beeman Quits Race and Democratic Do-over). The facts reported in these articles can only lead the reader to conclude that many wrongs have occurred here and Mr. Lingard has been denied his democratic right to serve as Commissioner. For the sake of brevity, I’ll summarize some of the wrongs as follows: 1. Candidates thinking they have the right to be consulted in advance of other candidates in the making of election rules about advance polls or any other aspect of an election. Elections are governed by independent bodies or positions such as Town Clerks and in this case he (Mr Towne) ruled an advance poll was required and advertised it accordingly. He (Towne) acted appropriately. Commissioners have no business in this area. 2. Resignations are final. If only one candidate remains after a nomination date has passed then that person becomes elected my acclimation. At least, this is the case, in every other part of the democratic world! 3. You can’t have an election “do-over” or hit the “reset button” or anything of that nature while you have a candidate who is offering himself. The motion in the AGM, to open nominations, was invalid because the election would have (should have) been in the hands of the independent election officer not a group of 30 residents at an AGM. In any case, it’s my prediction that this wrong decision will be corrected by Municipal Affaires because of the obvious errors, but should never have happened in the first place.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Register/Advertiser is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

More

  • No available services
Ad Finder

May 17th 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising